It’s December 2025. A nurse in Leeds grabs a vial from the shelf during a busy night shift. The label says levoTHYroxine. The patient needs thyroid medication. But the vial next to it? SYNTHROID. Same color. Same size. Same font. The nurse doesn’t notice the difference in capitalization. She administers the wrong one. The patient’s heart rate spikes. They’re rushed to ICU. It wasn’t negligence. It was a look-alike, sound-alike (LASA) error - and it happens more often than you think.
What Exactly Are Look-Alike, Sound-Alike Medications?
Look-alike, sound-alike (LASA) drugs are medications that look similar on the label, sound alike when spoken aloud, or even resemble each other in shape, color, or packaging. These similarities aren’t accidents. They’re mistakes baked into the system. One in four medication errors in the U.S. comes from confusing two drug names. That’s not rare. That’s routine.
Take HYDROmorphone and hYDROcodone. Both are opioids. Both are used for pain. Both are written in hospital systems with tall man lettering - the capital letters meant to highlight differences. But in a rush, under dim lights, during a handoff, “hydro” sounds the same. “Morphone” and “codone” blur together. A patient gets 10 times the dose they should. That’s not hypothetical. It’s documented in FDA reports.
Or consider doxorubicin and daunorubicin. Both are chemotherapy drugs. Both are red. Both are given intravenously. But one treats leukemia. The other treats breast cancer. Mix them up? The patient could die. There’s no second chance.
Even small differences matter. Simvastatin 10 mg and simvastatin 20 mg - same drug, different strength. One study found this pair caused more errors than any other LASA combination. Why? Because people assume the strength is the only difference. They don’t check. They trust the label. And that’s exactly what the system exploits.
Why Do These Errors Keep Happening?
It’s not just bad handwriting or tired staff. It’s design. Drug names are approved by regulators without enough testing for how confusing they are. The FDA denied 34 new drug names in 2022 because they were too similar to existing ones. That’s progress. But 34 out of hundreds of new drugs approved each year? That’s not enough.
Phonetic confusion happens when a doctor says “celexa” and the pharmacist hears “selexa.” Or when a nurse hears “insulin” and the system reads “heparin.” Verbal orders are a minefield. In ICUs, where time is tight and voices are muffled by masks and machines, these mistakes happen daily.
Visual confusion is just as dangerous. Two drugs with identical bottle shapes. Same color caps. Same font size. Same placement of the name. One is for high blood pressure. The other is for seizures. The nurse doesn’t read the label - she reads the bottle. And her brain fills in the rest.
And then there’s packaging. A pill for depression looks exactly like a pill for diabetes. Same round shape. Same white color. Same imprint. Only the strength differs. One patient gets 500 mg of metformin instead of 10 mg of sertraline. They go into hypoglycemic shock. The error? Undetected for hours.
Who’s Most at Risk?
High-alert medications are the biggest problem. These are drugs where even a small mistake can kill. Insulin. Opioids. Anticoagulants like warfarin. Chemotherapy agents. Neuromuscular blockers like vecuronium. These are the drugs that show up most often in LASA error reports.
Oncology units are ground zero. A 2022 survey found 92% of oncologists had experienced a LASA near-miss in the past year. Why? Because chemotherapy has dozens of similarly named drugs - melphalan, meloxicam; naltrexone, naloxone. One letter. One syllable. Different purpose. Different outcome.
But it’s not just oncology. Emergency rooms. ICUs. Even general wards. Nurses on night shifts. Pharmacists juggling 30 prescriptions at once. Doctors rushing between patients. These aren’t outliers. They’re the norm.
And the consequences? Real. The FDA’s MAUDE database recorded at least 128 deaths linked to LASA errors between 2018 and 2022. That’s not a statistic. That’s 128 people who didn’t have to die.
What’s Being Done to Stop It?
There are tools. There are rules. But they’re not used consistently.
Tall man lettering - using capital letters to highlight differences - has been around since 2001. HYDROmorphone vs. hYDROcodone. cisPLATIN vs. caraPLATIN. It sounds simple. But studies show it only helps if people know why it’s there. If you don’t know the system, you don’t notice the difference. It’s like a placebo for safety.
Hospitals are supposed to create their own LASA lists - tailored to the drugs they actually use. But only 72% of large U.S. hospitals do it. Smaller ones? Just 38%. That means in many places, staff are flying blind.
Electronic health records (EHRs) like Epic and Cerner now have built-in LASA alerts. Epic’s SafeMed module reduced errors by nearly 30% in a 12-hospital trial. But if the system doesn’t flag the right pair - or if the alert is buried under 10 other pop-ups - it’s useless.
Some hospitals use color-coded labels. Others use barcodes. Some have moved to automated dispensing cabinets that require two scans before releasing a drug. But none of these are universal. And none are foolproof.
What Can You Do - As a Patient or Caregiver?
You don’t have to wait for the system to fix itself. You can protect yourself.
- Ask for the generic name. If your doctor says “I’m giving you Lexapro,” ask: “Is that escitalopram?” If they say “I’m giving you insulin,” ask: “Which kind? Humalog? Lantus? NovoLog?”
- Check the label yourself. Don’t assume the pharmacy got it right. Look at the name, the strength, the color. Compare it to the last time you got it.
- Speak up during handoffs. If you’re in the hospital, listen to the nurse or doctor say your medication out loud. If they say “vee-roo-nee-um,” but you know you’re on “versed,” say something.
- Keep a list. Write down every medication you take - name, strength, purpose. Bring it to every appointment. Use it to cross-check.
One patient in Leeds told me she stopped taking her blood thinner because the pill looked different. She called the pharmacy. Turned out it was a different brand - same drug. But she didn’t know that. She assumed it was wrong. She was right to question it.
The Future: AI, Regulation, and Human Design
The future isn’t just about better labels. It’s about smarter systems.
The FDA is now requiring new drug names to pass computerized tests for similarity before approval. Algorithms scan names for phonetic and visual overlap using the same models that predicted error rates back in 1999. That’s progress.
Researchers at Johns Hopkins are testing AI voice recognition systems that listen to verbal medication orders in real time. If a nurse says “heparin” and the doctor meant “hydralazine,” the system flags it. Early results? 89% accurate. That could be a game-changer.
And the International Pharmaceutical Federation wants global standards for drug naming and packaging by 2030. Same shapes. Same colors. Same labeling rules. No more confusion.
But the biggest change? It’s not tech. It’s culture. We need to stop blaming nurses and pharmacists. We need to stop pretending these errors are human mistakes. They’re system failures. And fixing them means redesigning how drugs are named, packaged, and delivered - before they ever reach the shelf.
Final Thought: Safety Isn’t a Feature. It’s a Requirement.
Medication errors aren’t inevitable. They’re avoidable. But they’ll keep happening until we treat drug names like they matter - because they do. A single letter. A misplaced capital. A similar-sounding word. That’s all it takes.
It’s not about perfection. It’s about protection. And if we can design a pill that lasts 24 hours, we can design a name that won’t kill someone.
What are the most common look-alike, sound-alike drug pairs?
The most frequent LASA pairs include HYDROmorphone/hYDROcodone, doxorubicin/daunorubicin, simvastatin 10 mg/simvastatin 20 mg, levoTHYroxine/SYNTHROID, vecuronium/versed, and melphalan/meloxicam. These pairs are dangerous because they’re used in high-risk settings - like ICUs and oncology - where even small dosing errors can be fatal. The WHO and ISMP maintain updated lists, with new pairs added annually based on real-world error reports.
Is tall man lettering effective at preventing LASA errors?
Tall man lettering helps - but only if people know what it’s for. Studies show it reduces errors by about 10-15% when used correctly. But in many hospitals, staff don’t understand the system. They see “HYDROmorphone” and think it’s just bold text. It’s not a fix. It’s a reminder. And without training, it’s barely better than doing nothing.
Can patients do anything to avoid LASA errors?
Yes. Always ask for the generic name of your medication. Check the label against your own list. If a pill looks different from your last refill, ask why. Speak up during handoffs. If a nurse says “insulin” and you’re on Lantus, say, “I’m on Lantus - is that what you’re giving me?” Your vigilance can stop a mistake before it happens.
Why don’t drug companies use unique names to avoid confusion?
They used to. But drug naming is driven by marketing, not safety. Companies want names that sound familiar, easy to remember, or similar to successful drugs. Regulators have started rejecting names that are too similar - the FDA denied 34 in 2022 alone. But the process is slow. There are thousands of existing drugs with confusing names, and changing them isn’t practical. The focus now is on preventing new ones from being approved.
Are LASA errors more common in certain countries?
The problem exists everywhere, but the response varies. The U.S., Canada, and the UK have formal LASA lists and some level of electronic alerting. But in lower-resource settings, many hospitals don’t even have barcode scanners or EHRs. WHO reports that only 68 of 194 member states have national LASA prevention protocols. So yes - the risk is higher where systems are weaker.
There are 1 Comments
Helen Maples
The FDA’s 34 rejections in 2022 are a drop in the ocean. We’ve got thousands of LASA pairs already in circulation, and no one’s forcing manufacturers to change them. This isn’t a training issue - it’s a corporate negligence issue. Drug companies prioritize brand recognition over patient safety, and regulators are complicit. If you can’t prove a name causes harm before it’s approved, you’re not regulating - you’re gambling with lives.
Write a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *